Sunday, October 5, 2008

Bureau of Customs blamed for banned products

MANILA, Philippines—The Bureau of Customs (BOC) Sunday came under fire for the supposedly unregulated entry of Chinese food products into the country, amid a scare over milk products bought from China.

"These products should not have been allowed entry by the Bureau of Customs without import authority from the BFAD (Bureau of Food and Drugs)," Sen. Miriam Defensor-Santiago said on radio dzBB.

"The only job of the deputy commissioner and his customs investigation and intelligence service is confiscate all goods without the Philippine Certification of Safety Standard." That these products do not have English or Filipino translation of their Chinese labels showed the "incompetence" of the customs bureau, which approved their entry even without understanding the products' contents, Santiago said.

Corruption

Sen. Francis Pangilinan said the China milk scare, caused by fears that some of these products contain the industrial chemical melamine, should prompt the government to crack down on food smuggling.

"Potential harm is not confined to melamine-laced milk products but any unmonitored food product that enters the market," Pangilinan said in a statement.
Santiago said "the root of the problem is corruption in the BOC."

New agency

"All these products come in a van. You just pay P2,000 per van and they don't inspect its contents. We should have the head of the customs investigation and intel service and his men replaced," she said.

Sen. Pia S. Cayetano has called for the quick passage of Senate Bill No. 2645, which aims to reconstitute the BFAD into the Food, Drugs, Cosmetics and Devices Administration to beef up the country's "first line of defense" in consumer safety. The proposed agency, patterned after the US Food and Drugs Administration, will have complete testing laboratories in Luzon, Visayas and Mindanao and field offices in every region and major ports of entry. Cayetano said the bill would also address the problem of the BFAD's lack of manpower and funds.

"How can we expect only 195 field inspectors to effectively monitor and regulate all year round an industry with almost 46,000 establishments?" she asked. Gil C. Cabacungan Jr.-Philippine Daily Inquirer

No comments:

Post a Comment